








<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s 1985! Put on your smiley face.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jessicarulestheuniverse.com/2009/03/07/its-1985-put-on-your-smiley-face/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jessicarulestheuniverse.com/2009/03/07/its-1985-put-on-your-smiley-face/</link>
	<description>Twisted by Jessica Zafra - Pumping irony since 1994</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: emperorbananaketchup</title>
		<link>http://www.jessicarulestheuniverse.com/2009/03/07/its-1985-put-on-your-smiley-face/comment-page-1/#comment-39320</link>
		<dc:creator>emperorbananaketchup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessicarulestheuniverse.com/?p=2489#comment-39320</guid>
		<description>I liked the movie...which was greatly helped by having read the GN before.

It caught a lot of the original source&#039;s most recognizable frames, but wasn&#039;t as kiss-assingly reverent as Superman Returns.  The violence levels were just right - quite fitting since we&#039;re talking about real grown-up stuff here, not The Fantastic Four (hehehe)

Btw, Matthew Goode wasn&#039;t that good (baad pun alert) as Ozymandias...he looked like he was auditioning for Robin in Joel Schumacher&#039;s Bat-abominations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the movie&#8230;which was greatly helped by having read the GN before.</p>
<p>It caught a lot of the original source&#8217;s most recognizable frames, but wasn&#8217;t as kiss-assingly reverent as Superman Returns.  The violence levels were just right &#8211; quite fitting since we&#8217;re talking about real grown-up stuff here, not The Fantastic Four (hehehe)</p>
<p>Btw, Matthew Goode wasn&#8217;t that good (baad pun alert) as Ozymandias&#8230;he looked like he was auditioning for Robin in Joel Schumacher&#8217;s Bat-abominations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jara</title>
		<link>http://www.jessicarulestheuniverse.com/2009/03/07/its-1985-put-on-your-smiley-face/comment-page-1/#comment-39223</link>
		<dc:creator>Jara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessicarulestheuniverse.com/?p=2489#comment-39223</guid>
		<description>Here is another Watchmen video which spoofs the movie brilliantly:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8h7N2mVWjk .  I love how they have Rorschach&#039;s colourful metaphors done well.  For a one joke sketch, it plays really well.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another Watchmen video which spoofs the movie brilliantly:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8h7N2mVWjk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8h7N2mVWjk</a> .  I love how they have Rorschach&#8217;s colourful metaphors done well.  For a one joke sketch, it plays really well.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManilaBeans</title>
		<link>http://www.jessicarulestheuniverse.com/2009/03/07/its-1985-put-on-your-smiley-face/comment-page-1/#comment-39220</link>
		<dc:creator>ManilaBeans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessicarulestheuniverse.com/?p=2489#comment-39220</guid>
		<description>i beg to disagree with thecuriousdays&#039; comment regarding the ending. aside from being different, it&#039;s actually better than the orginal and in fact more believable as something that a genius would come up with. i initially hated what it did to dr manhattan&#039;s character but on hindsight it added another layer to his epiphany. alien invasion? now that&#039;s the weak one and i think it&#039;s something that veidt would have laughed at. surely a genius could cook up a better plan. and the movie came up with just that.

as for emphasizing powers, i don&#039;t think the movie did that. sure they seem to posess more strength than ordinary humans but anybody skilled in martial arts, or any combat style for that matter, would tell you that it&#039;s easy to hurl objects many times your weight. or kick the bejesus out of thugs. nothing out of the ordinary there. it&#039;s not as if the movie had the characters shooting beams from their eyes or something. 

sure the movie is not perfect, i have several issues with it as well, especially some minor changes like rorschach&#039;s epiphany. but it definitely is far from being a failure either. 

we should realize that it would always be difficult to translate a novel faithfully into a movie version, translating a graphic novel especially one with as huge a following as watchmen, is next to impossible. the graphic novel practically had snyder&#039;s hands tied, especially since moore didn&#039;t want to give his input (now that&#039;s a cop out). armed with only the original work, i&#039;d have to say that snyder did a heck of a good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i beg to disagree with thecuriousdays&#8217; comment regarding the ending. aside from being different, it&#8217;s actually better than the orginal and in fact more believable as something that a genius would come up with. i initially hated what it did to dr manhattan&#8217;s character but on hindsight it added another layer to his epiphany. alien invasion? now that&#8217;s the weak one and i think it&#8217;s something that veidt would have laughed at. surely a genius could cook up a better plan. and the movie came up with just that.</p>
<p>as for emphasizing powers, i don&#8217;t think the movie did that. sure they seem to posess more strength than ordinary humans but anybody skilled in martial arts, or any combat style for that matter, would tell you that it&#8217;s easy to hurl objects many times your weight. or kick the bejesus out of thugs. nothing out of the ordinary there. it&#8217;s not as if the movie had the characters shooting beams from their eyes or something. </p>
<p>sure the movie is not perfect, i have several issues with it as well, especially some minor changes like rorschach&#8217;s epiphany. but it definitely is far from being a failure either. </p>
<p>we should realize that it would always be difficult to translate a novel faithfully into a movie version, translating a graphic novel especially one with as huge a following as watchmen, is next to impossible. the graphic novel practically had snyder&#8217;s hands tied, especially since moore didn&#8217;t want to give his input (now that&#8217;s a cop out). armed with only the original work, i&#8217;d have to say that snyder did a heck of a good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thesecuriousdays</title>
		<link>http://www.jessicarulestheuniverse.com/2009/03/07/its-1985-put-on-your-smiley-face/comment-page-1/#comment-39169</link>
		<dc:creator>thesecuriousdays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessicarulestheuniverse.com/?p=2489#comment-39169</guid>
		<description>oh god, i disagree with this opinion on watchmen on almost ALL counts.

It was awful and the only thing I am thankful for is that I didn&#039;t pay to watch the movie!

And what do you mean the actors resembled the comic book counterparts?!? the film&#039;s OZYMANDIAS WAS FAR FROM LOOKING LIKE THE MOST INTELLIGENT, CLOSE-TO-PERFECT PERSON THAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE. He looked like a wimp!!! The resemblance ended with the blond hair! And where was the Owl&#039;s gut?!? 

The actor playing Rorshach was the closest to redemption this movie had (although it was obvious he was channeling Clint Eastwood).

What an insult to Alan Moore to say that his vision was embodied in this film. His vision wasn&#039;t to sexify, glamorize and emphasize the powers of these superheroes as the film did -- it was completely the opposite (the point was that everyone, except for Dr. Manhattan, DIDN&#039;T have superpowers and weren&#039;t flawlessly glamorous!!!). 

The ending was such a downer because it didn&#039;t make sense anymore after the lack of nuance of the whole film. The ending seemed weak and more like a cop-out (even though it was the same ending which was compelling and brilliant in comic book form), like M. Night had something to do with it.

Funny how two people can say the same exact words but have two totally different results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh god, i disagree with this opinion on watchmen on almost ALL counts.</p>
<p>It was awful and the only thing I am thankful for is that I didn&#8217;t pay to watch the movie!</p>
<p>And what do you mean the actors resembled the comic book counterparts?!? the film&#8217;s OZYMANDIAS WAS FAR FROM LOOKING LIKE THE MOST INTELLIGENT, CLOSE-TO-PERFECT PERSON THAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE. He looked like a wimp!!! The resemblance ended with the blond hair! And where was the Owl&#8217;s gut?!? </p>
<p>The actor playing Rorshach was the closest to redemption this movie had (although it was obvious he was channeling Clint Eastwood).</p>
<p>What an insult to Alan Moore to say that his vision was embodied in this film. His vision wasn&#8217;t to sexify, glamorize and emphasize the powers of these superheroes as the film did &#8212; it was completely the opposite (the point was that everyone, except for Dr. Manhattan, DIDN&#8217;T have superpowers and weren&#8217;t flawlessly glamorous!!!). </p>
<p>The ending was such a downer because it didn&#8217;t make sense anymore after the lack of nuance of the whole film. The ending seemed weak and more like a cop-out (even though it was the same ending which was compelling and brilliant in comic book form), like M. Night had something to do with it.</p>
<p>Funny how two people can say the same exact words but have two totally different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: volume-addict</title>
		<link>http://www.jessicarulestheuniverse.com/2009/03/07/its-1985-put-on-your-smiley-face/comment-page-1/#comment-39167</link>
		<dc:creator>volume-addict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessicarulestheuniverse.com/?p=2489#comment-39167</guid>
		<description>The verdict thus far on the movie seems split based on what I&#039;ve been reading on the &#039;net.  I&#039;m glad it&#039;s not tipping over to either positive or negative sides and clears out my own personal biases when I get the chance to check it out this Sunday.

Here&#039;s a brilliant skewering by way of the Watchmen Saturday cartoon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDDHHrt6l4w

As for FrancisM, I&#039;ve always considered him to be an extension of The Eraserheads, especially from Cutterpillow onwards.  His contribution to Fruitcake on vocals, the collaborative effort on a couple of tracks on Kiko&#039;s own Happy Battle album, and that now highly anticipated team-up with Ely and the rest of Pupil is enough to seal the deal and come to that conclusion.  He&#039;ll be greatly missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The verdict thus far on the movie seems split based on what I&#8217;ve been reading on the &#8216;net.  I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s not tipping over to either positive or negative sides and clears out my own personal biases when I get the chance to check it out this Sunday.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a brilliant skewering by way of the Watchmen Saturday cartoon:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDDHHrt6l4w" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDDHHrt6l4w</a></p>
<p>As for FrancisM, I&#8217;ve always considered him to be an extension of The Eraserheads, especially from Cutterpillow onwards.  His contribution to Fruitcake on vocals, the collaborative effort on a couple of tracks on Kiko&#8217;s own Happy Battle album, and that now highly anticipated team-up with Ely and the rest of Pupil is enough to seal the deal and come to that conclusion.  He&#8217;ll be greatly missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

